lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:41:16 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com> Cc: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, "a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, "ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH V7 2/4] firmware: imx: enable imx scu general irq function On 12/04/2019 02:32:54+0000, Anson Huang wrote: > > > As i.MX SCU general irq function is picked up by Shawn, could you > > > please also pick up below i.MX SC RTC alarm support patch ? > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10890525/ > > > > > > > No, it can't go through Alexandre's tree due to dependency issue. > > > > Shawn, > > Do you think you can pick it up? Alexandre already gave the Ack. > > > > AFAIK there's no other SCU RTC patches since v5.1-rc1 in Alexandre's tree. > > Yes, need to make sure the dependency is handled, the RTC alarm patch MUST be picked up > ONLY when scu irq patch is ready, NOT sure how to handle this case for such scenario? > Either it goes through arm-soc or if it can wait one release, I pick it up for 5.3. The other solution involves immutable branch but I don't think this is necessary. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists