[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09d160d1-fb0a-1cdb-77af-aeeebfaa69a7@st.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:57:03 +0000
From: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...com>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "wang.yi59@....com.cn" <wang.yi59@....com.cn>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: st: fix leaked of_node references
Hi Wen
On 4/12/19 8:02 AM, Wen Yang wrote:
> The call to of_get_child_by_name returns a node pointer with refcount
> incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last
> usage.
>
> Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings:
> ./drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c:1188:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 1175, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
> ./drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c:1188:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 1175, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
> ./drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c:1199:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 1175, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
> ./drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c:1199:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 1175, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> index e66af93..195b442 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> @@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ static int st_pctl_dt_parse_groups(struct device_node *np,
> struct property *pp;
> struct st_pinconf *conf;
> struct device_node *pins;
> - int i = 0, npins = 0, nr_props;
> + int i = 0, npins = 0, nr_props, ret = 0;
>
> pins = of_get_child_by_name(np, "st,pins");
> if (!pins)
> @@ -1185,7 +1185,8 @@ static int st_pctl_dt_parse_groups(struct device_node *np,
> npins++;
> } else {
> pr_warn("Invalid st,pins in %pOFn node\n", np);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_node;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1195,8 +1196,10 @@ static int st_pctl_dt_parse_groups(struct device_node *np,
> grp->pin_conf = devm_kcalloc(info->dev,
> npins, sizeof(*conf), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> - if (!grp->pins || !grp->pin_conf)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!grp->pins || !grp->pin_conf) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_put_node;
> + }
>
> /* <bank offset mux direction rt_type rt_delay rt_clk> */
> for_each_property_of_node(pins, pp) {
> @@ -1229,9 +1232,11 @@ static int st_pctl_dt_parse_groups(struct device_node *np,
> }
> i++;
> }
> +
> +out_put_node:
> of_node_put(pins);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int st_pctl_parse_functions(struct device_node *np,
>
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists