[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190412134459.446ef705c86aa1c7b926abc7@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:44:59 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Joshua Kinard <kumba@...too.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rtc: ds1685: use correct device struct to get
platform device struct
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:11:06 +0200
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> Every patch need a commit message. Maybe you could indicate that this
> never gave any issue because parent is the first member of struct
> device.
I'll update the commit message, I get a nice stacktrace because of that
bug, so the path from work_queue calling ds1685_rtc_poweroff never worked.
Thomas.
--
SUSE Linux GmbH
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists