[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5677286.2uEqRd8HI1@diego>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:15:54 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xxx@...k-chips.com, xf@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
dianders@...omium.org, briannorris@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] clk: rockchip: add pll up and down when change pll freq
Hi Elaine,
Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2019, 11:44:09 CEST schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> set pll sequence:
> ->set pll to slow mode or other plls
> ->set pll down
> ->set pll params
> ->set pll up
> ->wait pll lock status
> ->set pll to normal mode
>
> To slove the system error:
> wait_pll_lock: timeout waiting for pll to lock
> pll_set_params: pll update unsucessful,
> trying to restore old params
Can you tell me on what soc this was experienced?
The patch includes rk3399, but I don't think the CrOS kernel
does powerdown the pll when changing the cpu-frequency
[added Doug and Brian for clarification and possible testing :-) ]
But I did find that the M0 code in ATF does actually power-down the
PLL and follow your outline from above. So essentially I'd just like
a thumbs up from chromeos people if they have the time.
Heiko
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> index dd0433d4753e..9fe1227e77e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> @@ -208,6 +208,11 @@ static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_set_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
> rate_change_remuxed = 1;
> }
>
> + /* set pll power down */
> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(1,
> + RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 13),
> + pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(1));
> +
> /* update pll values */
> writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(rate->fbdiv, RK3036_PLLCON0_FBDIV_MASK,
> RK3036_PLLCON0_FBDIV_SHIFT) |
> @@ -229,6 +234,10 @@ static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_set_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
> pllcon |= rate->frac << RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT;
> writel_relaxed(pllcon, pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(2));
>
> + /* set pll power up */
> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 13),
> + pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(1));
> +
> /* wait for the pll to lock */
> ret = rockchip_pll_wait_lock(pll);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -685,6 +694,11 @@ static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_set_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
> rate_change_remuxed = 1;
> }
>
> + /* set pll power down */
> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(RK3399_PLLCON3_PWRDOWN,
> + RK3399_PLLCON3_PWRDOWN, 0),
> + pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(3));
> +
> /* update pll values */
> writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(rate->fbdiv, RK3399_PLLCON0_FBDIV_MASK,
> RK3399_PLLCON0_FBDIV_SHIFT),
> @@ -708,6 +722,11 @@ static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_set_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
> RK3399_PLLCON3_DSMPD_SHIFT),
> pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(3));
>
> + /* set pll power up */
> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(0,
> + RK3399_PLLCON3_PWRDOWN, 0),
> + pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(3));
> +
> /* wait for the pll to lock */
> ret = rockchip_rk3399_pll_wait_lock(pll);
> if (ret) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists