[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wieBr3G=_ZGoCndi8XnuG1wtkedaGqkWB+=AVq65=_8sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:32:38 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 1808d65b55 ("asm-generic/tlb: Remove arch_tlb*_mmu()"): BUG:
KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __change_page_attr_set_clr
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:56 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> {
> int cpu;
>
> - struct flush_tlb_info info __aligned(SMP_CACHE_BYTES) = {
> + struct flush_tlb_info info = {
> .mm = mm,
> .stride_shift = stride_shift,
> .freed_tables = freed_tables,
>
Ack.
We should never have stack alignment bigger than 16 bytes. And
preferably not even that. Trying to align stack at a cacheline
boundary is wrong - if you *really* need things to be that aligned, do
something else (regular kmalloc, percpu temp area, static allocation -
whatever).
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists