linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "clk: rockchip: mark noc and some special clk as critical on rk3288"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=V8OdOCd819i51WnBSo=C=Y7dqBtH1gTpZiVhnNWn4OJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:41:18 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     "elaine.zhang" <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@...k-chips.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Ryan Case <ryandcase@...omium.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "clk: rockchip: mark noc and some special clk
 as critical on rk3288"

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 6:43 PM elaine.zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> >>> -     "pmu_hclk_otg0",
> >>>
> >>> It's a soc bug, pmu_hclk_otg0 must always on.
> >>>
> >>> So you said in your previous commit message.  However we've shipped
> >>> lots and lots of Chromebooks with this clock off.  Can you explain
> >>> what is broken?  Is this only needed for gadget mode (which we don't
> >>> use), for instance?
> >>>
> >>> test case:
> >>>
> >>> recovery test,  < 1 hour , system crash.
> >>>
> >>> log:
> >>>
> >>> [  127.569629] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GOTGCTL        @0xFFFFFF8000B80000 : 0x00400010
> >>> [  127.569644] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GOTGINT        @0xFFFFFF8000B80004 : 0x00400010
> >>> [  127.569659] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GAHBCFG        @0xFFFFFF8000B80008 : 0x00400010
> >>> [  127.569673] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GUSBCFG        @0xFFFFFF8000B8000C : 0x00400010
> >>> [  127.569688] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GRSTCTL        @0xFFFFFF8000B80010 : 0x00400010
> >>> [  127.569702] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GINTSTS        @0xFFFFFF8000B80014 : 0x00400010
> >>> [  127.569718] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GINTMSK        @0xFFFFFF8000B80018 : 0x00400010
> >>> [  127.569733] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GRXSTSR        @0xFFFFFF8000B8001C : 0x00400010
> >>> [  127.569748] I[0:      swapper/0:    0] GRXFSIZ        @0xFFFFFF8000B80024 : 0x00400010
> >> I don't know what a "recovery test" is and I don't understand your logs.
> >>
> >> Can you explain we do not run into this on Chromebooks?
> >>
> >>
> >>> reason:
> >>>
> >>> USB OTG controller supports turning off most logic power, and then only one PMU module is left. This clock cannot be turned off, which is similar to the always on module in USB OTG.
> >> Can't you just add a patch to the dwc2 driver to have it grab this
> >> clock?  I assume this clock doesn't need to be turned on unless you're
> >> using the OTG contoller in a certain way?
> > So far we don't really know where the clock in question is sitting
> > in the clock hirarchy. For example the kernel got a new interconnect
> > framework recently, so handling non-device clocks in a device may haunt
> > us later on.
> >
> > @Elaine: could you elaborate what pmu_hclk_otg0 actually is for please?
>
> Doug:
>
> Recovry test: Regular factory tests, including restart, adb debugging,
> clear data/factory Settings, and clear cache.
> I'm not clear whether the test was added by chromebooks.
>
> Heiko:
>
> pmu_hclk_otg0： pmu ahb clock
>
> Function: Clock to pmu module when hibernation and/or ADP is
> enabled.Must be greater than or equal to 30 MHz.

Does this mean we can enable hibernation in dwc2 once we turn this
clock on?  I think right now hibernation doesn't work for dwc2 on
rk3288.  Not that I know a ton about dwc2's hibernation modes, but
I've certainly bumped up against it when enabling power down modes.
In fact I'm planning to post some patches soon...  I'll CC you.


> If the SOC design does not support hibernation/ADP function, only have
> hclk_otg, this clk can be switched according to the usage of otg.
> If the SOC design support hibernation/ADP, has two clocks, hclk_otg and
> pmu_hclk_otg0.
> Hclk_otg belongs to the closed part of otg logic, which can be switched
> according to the use of otg.
>
> pmu_hclk_otg0 belongs to the always on part.
>
> As for whether pmu_hclk_otg0 can be turned off when otg is not in use,
> we have not tested. IC suggest make pmu_hclk_otg0 always on.

OK.  I'm fine with this clock staying as a critical clock for now.

I'll send out a v2 shortly.

-Doug