linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 21/41] proc: Simplify task stack retrieval

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190414144931.GA14344@avx2>
Date:   Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:49:31 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 21/41] proc: Simplify task stack retrieval

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:28:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -430,20 +429,16 @@ static int proc_pid_stack(struct seq_fil
>  	if (!entries)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	trace.nr_entries	= 0;
> -	trace.max_entries	= MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH;
> -	trace.entries		= entries;
> -	trace.skip		= 0;
> -
>  	err = lock_trace(task);
>  	if (!err) {
> -		unsigned int i;
> +		unsigned int i, nent;
>  
> -		save_stack_trace_tsk(task, &trace);
> +		nent = stack_trace_save_tsk(task, entries,
> +					    MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH, 0);
>  
> -		for (i = 0; i < trace.nr_entries; i++) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < nent; i++)
>  			seq_printf(m, "[<0>] %pB\n", (void *)entries[i]);
> -		}
> +

I only object to {} removal. The rule of mandatory {} that new languages
have adopted is pretty cool. Otherwise

Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>