lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <45e82026-3240-1c98-758b-d41fcc404377@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 18:27:43 +0300 From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>, Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RE-SEND] clk: tegra: Don't enable already enabled PLLs 04.03.2019 16:42, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > 04.03.2019 11:18, Peter De Schrijver пишет: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:15:04PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>> 24.02.2019 18:32, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: >>>> Initially Common Clock Framework isn't aware of the clock-enable status, >>>> this results in enabling of clocks that were enabled by bootloader. This >>>> is not a big deal for a regular clock-gates, but for PLL's it may have >>>> some unpleasant consequences. Thus re-enabling PLLX (the main CPU parent >>>> clock) may result in extra long period of PLL re-locking. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> >>>> --- >>> >>> Peter (and everyone else), yours r-b and ACK will be appreciated since you kinda already took a look at this patch in the past and were okay with it (IIRC, we had some brief discussion on the #tegra IRC a few months ago), thanks. >>> >> >> Acked-By: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com> >> > > Awesome, thanks again! > Hello Stephen and Michael, Could you please pick up this patch to get it into linux-next to get some more testing exposure before it will hit upstream? Thanks in advance.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists