linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [PATCHv1] drivers: edac: This patch fix the following checkpatch warning.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:49:34 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCHv1] drivers: edac: This patch fix the following
 checkpatch warning.

On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 09:41:50PM +0300, Mohan Kumar wrote:
> Use pr_warn instead of printk
> 
> WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_err([subsystem]dev, ...
>         then dev_err(dev, ... then pr_err(...  to printk(KERN_ERR ...

Please read this here first on what to put in your patch title and commit
message:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

> Signed-off-by: Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/edac/x38_edac.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/x38_edac.c b/drivers/edac/x38_edac.c
> index cc779f3..4c855c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/x38_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/x38_edac.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
>  #include <linux/edac.h>
> +#include <linux/netdevice.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
>  #include "edac_module.h"
> @@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ static void __iomem *x38_map_mchbar(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	u.mchbar &= X38_MCHBAR_MASK;
>  
>  	if (u.mchbar != (resource_size_t)u.mchbar) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR
> +		pr_err(
>  			"x38: mmio space beyond accessible range (0x%llx)\n",

Put those two on a single line so that you don't have an ugly linebreak
like that.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.