[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190415202849.GA31243@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:28:49 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Lei YU <mine260309@...il.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon (occ): Fix extended status bits
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 06:37:20PM +0800, Lei YU wrote:
> The occ's extended status is checked and shown as sysfs attributes. But
> the code was incorrectly checking the "status" bits.
> Fix it by checking the "ext_status" bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lei YU <mine260309@...il.com>
Looks ok to me, but can I get a confirmation from someone at IBM ?
Thanks,
Guenter
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/occ/sysfs.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/occ/sysfs.c b/drivers/hwmon/occ/sysfs.c
> index fe3d15e..a71ca94 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/occ/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/occ/sysfs.c
> @@ -42,16 +42,16 @@ static ssize_t occ_sysfs_show(struct device *dev,
> val = !!(header->status & OCC_STAT_ACTIVE);
> break;
> case 2:
> - val = !!(header->status & OCC_EXT_STAT_DVFS_OT);
> + val = !!(header->ext_status & OCC_EXT_STAT_DVFS_OT);
> break;
> case 3:
> - val = !!(header->status & OCC_EXT_STAT_DVFS_POWER);
> + val = !!(header->ext_status & OCC_EXT_STAT_DVFS_POWER);
> break;
> case 4:
> - val = !!(header->status & OCC_EXT_STAT_MEM_THROTTLE);
> + val = !!(header->ext_status & OCC_EXT_STAT_MEM_THROTTLE);
> break;
> case 5:
> - val = !!(header->status & OCC_EXT_STAT_QUICK_DROP);
> + val = !!(header->ext_status & OCC_EXT_STAT_QUICK_DROP);
> break;
> case 6:
> val = header->occ_state;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists