linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: sound: sun4i-spdif: Add Allwinner H6 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJiuCceTS=+PM9CLiU6JrfxpPNC5m3XB+j46K6efuM6tYG45Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:11:38 +0200
From:   Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: sound: sun4i-spdif: Add Allwinner H6 compatible

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 10:09, Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 10:04, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:44:19PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> > > Allwinner H6 has a SPDIF controller with an increase of the fifo
> > > size and the possibility to output the master clock.
> > > However it's still compatible with the already existing driver for
> > > Allwiner H3.
> > >
> > > Add this compatible in the device-tree bindings documentation.
> >
> > How was this tested?
>
> Using Alsa utils on a Beelink GS1 and I check correct output sound on
> my home cinema.
> >
> > After looking at the datasheet, it looks like it's still significantly
> > different. In particular:
> >
> >   - The MCLK divider isn't at the same offset
> We don't use the MCLK
> >   - The bits to flush the FIFO aren't at the same offset
> >   - The FIFO trigger levels aren't at the same offset
> >   - The FIFO status register layout is almost entirely different
> We use DMA not FIFO

And also only SPDIF Tx has been tested.

>
> Clement
> >
> > So it doesn't really look compatible to me
> >
> > Maxime
> >
> > --
> > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> > https://bootlin.com