linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 1/7] jump_label: Add for_each_label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190415105159.GI11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:51:59 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/7] jump_label: Add for_each_label_entry helper

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:58:13AM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> Add a helper macro to make jump entry iteration code more readable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>

> diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
> index 3e113a1fa0f1..7e91af98bbb1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
> @@ -227,6 +227,9 @@ extern void static_key_disable(struct static_key *key);
>  extern void static_key_enable_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key);
>  extern void static_key_disable_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key);
>  
> +#define for_each_label_entry(key, entry, stop)				  \
> +	for (; (entry < stop) && (jump_entry_key(entry) == key); entry++)
> +

I don't really like this naming; most (all?) for_each_*() loops start
iteration and have the iteration variable as first argument.

This should maybe be called:

	for_each_jump_entry_by_key_cont(entry, stop, key)

and I realize that is a horrible name too.