| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190415144930.pntid6evu6r67l4o@e110439-lin>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:51:07 +0100
From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/16] sched/core: Add bucket local max tracking
On 02-Apr 11:41, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> Because of bucketization, different task-specific clamp values are
> tracked in the same bucket. For example, with 20% bucket size and
> assuming to have:
> Task1: util_min=25%
> Task2: util_min=35%
> both tasks will be refcounted in the [20..39]% bucket and always boosted
> only up to 20% thus implementing a simple floor aggregation normally
> used in histograms.
>
> In systems with only few and well-defined clamp values, it would be
> useful to track the exact clamp value required by a task whenever
> possible. For example, if a system requires only 23% and 47% boost
> values then it's possible to track the exact boost required by each
> task using only 3 buckets of ~33% size each.
>
> Introduce a mechanism to max aggregate the requested clamp values of
> RUNNABLE tasks in the same bucket. Keep it simple by resetting the
> bucket value to its base value only when a bucket becomes inactive.
> Allow a limited and controlled overboosting margin for tasks recounted
> in the same bucket.
>
> In systems where the boost values are not known in advance, it is still
> possible to control the maximum acceptable overboosting margin by tuning
> the number of clamp groups. For example, 20 groups ensure a 5% maximum
> overboost.
>
> Remove the rq bucket initialization code since a correct bucket value
> is now computed when a task is refcounted into a CPU's rq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> --
> Changes in v8:
> Message-ID: <20190313193916.GQ2482@...ktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
> - split this code out from the previous patch
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 032211b72110..6e1beae5f348 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -778,6 +778,11 @@ unsigned int uclamp_rq_max_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> * When a task is enqueued on a rq, the clamp bucket currently defined by the
> * task's uclamp::bucket_id is refcounted on that rq. This also immediately
> * updates the rq's clamp value if required.
> + *
> + * Tasks can have a task-specific value requested from user-space, track
> + * within each bucket the maximum value for tasks refcounted in it.
> + * This "local max aggregation" allows to track the exact "requested" value
> + * for each bucket when all its RUNNABLE tasks require the same clamp.
> */
> static inline void uclamp_rq_inc_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> unsigned int clamp_id)
> @@ -789,8 +794,15 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> bucket = &uc_rq->bucket[uc_se->bucket_id];
> bucket->tasks++;
>
> + /*
> + * Local max aggregation: rq buckets always track the max
> + * "requested" clamp value of its RUNNABLE tasks.
> + */
> + if (uc_se->value > bucket->value)
> + bucket->value = uc_se->value;
> +
> if (uc_se->value > READ_ONCE(uc_rq->value))
> - WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, bucket->value);
> + WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, uc_se->value);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -815,6 +827,12 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> if (likely(bucket->tasks))
> bucket->tasks--;
>
> + /*
> + * Keep "local max aggregation" simple and accept to (possibly)
> + * overboost some RUNNABLE tasks in the same bucket.
> + * The rq clamp bucket value is reset to its base value whenever
> + * there are no more RUNNABLE tasks refcounting it.
> + */
> if (likely(bucket->tasks))
> return;
>
> @@ -824,8 +842,14 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> * e.g. due to future modification, warn and fixup the expected value.
> */
> SCHED_WARN_ON(bucket->value > rq_clamp);
> - if (bucket->value >= rq_clamp)
> + if (bucket->value >= rq_clamp) {
> + /*
> + * Reset clamp bucket value to its nominal value whenever
> + * there are anymore RUNNABLE tasks refcounting it.
> + */
> + bucket->value = uclamp_bucket_base_value(bucket->value);
While running tests on Android, I found that the snipped above should
be better done in uclamp_rq_inc_id() for two main reasons:
1. because of the early return in this function, we skip the reset in
case the task is not the last one running on a CPU, thus
triggering the above SCHED_WARN_ON
2. since a non active bucket is already ignored, we don't care about
resetting its "local max value"
Will move the "max local update" in uclamp_rq_inc_id() where something
like:
/*
* Local max aggregation: rq buckets always track the max
* "requested" clamp value of its RUNNABLE tasks.
*/
if (bucket->tasks == 1 || uc_se->value > bucket->value)
bucket->value = uc_se->value;
Should grant to always have an updated local max every time a bucket
is active.
> WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, clamp_id));
> + }
> }
>
> static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -855,25 +879,9 @@ static void __init init_uclamp(void)
> unsigned int clamp_id;
> int cpu;
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - struct uclamp_bucket *bucket;
> - struct uclamp_rq *uc_rq;
> - unsigned int bucket_id;
> -
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> memset(&cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp, 0, sizeof(struct uclamp_rq));
>
> - for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) {
> - uc_rq = &cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp[clamp_id];
> -
> - bucket_id = 1;
> - while (bucket_id < UCLAMP_BUCKETS) {
> - bucket = &uc_rq->bucket[bucket_id];
> - bucket->value = bucket_id * UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA;
> - ++bucket_id;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> -
> for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) {
> struct uclamp_se *uc_se = &init_task.uclamp[clamp_id];
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists