| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHN4kMBScdEdJodtmbHQ2qhVDnXrJKFDdaSYyjWH0JH5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:36:10 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/16] sched/core: uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:42 AM Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:
>
> When a task sleeps it removes its max utilization clamp from its CPU.
> However, the blocked utilization on that CPU can be higher than the max
> clamp value enforced while the task was running. This allows undesired
> CPU frequency increases while a CPU is idle, for example, when another
> CPU on the same frequency domain triggers a frequency update, since
> schedutil can now see the full not clamped blocked utilization of the
> idle CPU.
>
> Fix this by using
> uclamp_rq_dec_id(p, rq, UCLAMP_MAX)
> uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, UCLAMP_MAX, clamp_value)
> to detect when a CPU has no more RUNNABLE clamped tasks and to flag this
> condition.
>
If I understand the intent correctly, you are trying to exclude idle
CPUs from affecting calculations of rq UCLAMP_MAX value. If that is
true I think description can be simplified a bit :) In particular it
took me some time to understand what "blocked utilization" means,
however if it's a widely accepted term then feel free to ignore my
input.
> Don't track any minimum utilization clamps since an idle CPU never
> requires a minimum frequency. The decay of the blocked utilization is
> good enough to reduce the CPU frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> --
> Changes in v8:
> Message-ID: <20190314170619.rt6yhelj3y6dzypu@...0439-lin>
> - moved flag reset into uclamp_rq_inc()
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 6e1beae5f348..046f61d33f00 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -754,8 +754,35 @@ static inline unsigned int uclamp_none(int clamp_id)
> return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned int
> +uclamp_idle_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id, unsigned int clamp_value)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Avoid blocked utilization pushing up the frequency when we go
> + * idle (which drops the max-clamp) by retaining the last known
> + * max-clamp.
> + */
> + if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MAX) {
> + rq->uclamp_flags |= UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> + return clamp_value;
> + }
> +
> + return uclamp_none(UCLAMP_MIN);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void uclamp_idle_reset(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id,
> + unsigned int clamp_value)
> +{
> + /* Reset max-clamp retention only on idle exit */
> + if (!(rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE))
> + return;
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, clamp_value);
> +}
> +
> static inline
> -unsigned int uclamp_rq_max_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> +unsigned int uclamp_rq_max_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id,
> + unsigned int clamp_value)
IMHO the name of uclamp_rq_max_value() is a bit misleading because:
1. It does not imply that it has to be called only when there are no
more runnable tasks on a CPU. This is currently the case because it's
called only from uclamp_rq_dec_id() and only when bucket->tasks==0 but
nothing in the name of this function indicates that it can't be called
from other places.
2. It does not imply that it marks rq UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE.
> {
> struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket;
> int bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS - 1;
> @@ -771,7 +798,7 @@ unsigned int uclamp_rq_max_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> }
>
> /* No tasks -- default clamp values */
> - return uclamp_none(clamp_id);
> + return uclamp_idle_value(rq, clamp_id, clamp_value);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -794,6 +821,8 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> bucket = &uc_rq->bucket[uc_se->bucket_id];
> bucket->tasks++;
>
> + uclamp_idle_reset(rq, clamp_id, uc_se->value);
> +
> /*
> * Local max aggregation: rq buckets always track the max
> * "requested" clamp value of its RUNNABLE tasks.
> @@ -820,6 +849,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> struct uclamp_rq *uc_rq = &rq->uclamp[clamp_id];
> struct uclamp_se *uc_se = &p->uclamp[clamp_id];
> struct uclamp_bucket *bucket;
> + unsigned int bkt_clamp;
> unsigned int rq_clamp;
>
> bucket = &uc_rq->bucket[uc_se->bucket_id];
> @@ -848,7 +878,8 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> * there are anymore RUNNABLE tasks refcounting it.
> */
> bucket->value = uclamp_bucket_base_value(bucket->value);
> - WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, clamp_id));
> + bkt_clamp = uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, clamp_id, uc_se->value);
> + WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, bkt_clamp);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -861,6 +892,10 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
> for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id)
> uclamp_rq_inc_id(p, rq, clamp_id);
> +
> + /* Reset clamp idle holding when there is one RUNNABLE task */
> + if (rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE)
> + rq->uclamp_flags &= ~UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> }
>
> static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -879,8 +914,10 @@ static void __init init_uclamp(void)
> unsigned int clamp_id;
> int cpu;
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> memset(&cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp, 0, sizeof(struct uclamp_rq));
> + cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp_flags = 0;
> + }
>
> for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) {
> struct uclamp_se *uc_se = &init_task.uclamp[clamp_id];
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index c3d1ae1e7eec..d8b182f1782c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -880,6 +880,8 @@ struct rq {
> #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
> /* Utilization clamp values based on CPU's RUNNABLE tasks */
> struct uclamp_rq uclamp[UCLAMP_CNT] ____cacheline_aligned;
> + unsigned int uclamp_flags;
> +#define UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE 0x01
> #endif
>
> struct cfs_rq cfs;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists