[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <982e69c6-4e68-6f62-8bed-cd5a1802272b@metux.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 19:41:02 +0200
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, mark.rutland@....com, afaerber@...e.de,
treding@...dia.com, david@...hnology.com, noralf@...nnes.org,
johan@...nel.org, monstr@...str.eu, michal.vokac@...ft.com,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, john.garry@...wei.com,
geert+renesas@...der.be, robin.murphy@....com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com, icenowy@...c.io,
stuyoder@...il.com, jan.kiszka@...mens.com,
maxime.ripard@...tlin.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/7] Add Fieldbus subsystem + support HMS Profinet
card
On 09.04.19 16:42, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
Hi,
> Fieldbus device (client) adapters allow data exchange with a PLC aka.
> "Fieldbus Controller" over a fieldbus (Profinet, FLNet, etc.)
AFAIK, "fieldbus" is a bit broader term than just the typical IEC61158-
style remote memory stuff. At least that's the terminology my clients
tend to use (eg. they also call some homebbrewn rs485-based protocols
"fieldbus").
Maybe it would be better calling it "IEC-61158" instead of "fieldbus" ?
By the way: can this device be opened/used by several processes
simultaniously ?
--mtx
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287
Powered by blists - more mailing lists