lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:39:35 -0500
From:   Corey Minyard <>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
        Andy Shevchenko <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: avoid atomic_inc in exit function

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:40:22AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:55:00PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > This causes a link failure on ARM in certain configurations,
> > when we reference each atomic operation from .alt.smp.init in
> > order to patch out atomics on non-SMP systems:
> > 
> > `.exit.text' referenced in section `.alt.smp.init' of drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o
> > 
> > In this case, we can trivially replace the atomic_inc() with
> > an atomic_set() that has the same effect and does not require
> > a fixup.
> I'd rather fіx the arm section management.  Using atomic in exit
> routines is perfectly valid, and it would seem odd to forbid it.

That was my first thought, too.  It's kind of hard to believe that
the IPMI driver is the only thing that does an atomic_inc() in the
exit code.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists