[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj2SW0Zno0Yn=S9wrsmHOKV0FiFPiPS4TM=Gn8yjfYXAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:49:46 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.1-rc5
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:16 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> We actually already *have* this function.
>
> It's called "gup_fast_permitted()" and it's used by x86-64 to verify
> the proper address range. Exactly like s390 needs..
>
> Could you please use that instead?
IOW, something like the attached.
Obviously untested. And maybe 'current' isn't declared in
<asm/pgtable.h>, in which case you'd need to modify it to instead make
the inline function be "s390_gup_fast_permitted()" that takes a
pointer to the mm, and do something like
#define gup_fast_permitted(start, pages) \
s390_gup_fast_permitted(current->mm, start, pages)
instead.
But I think you get the idea..
Linus
View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (724 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists