[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjKi5C+Onhp5Vs5BQxHbaBud9M3cTS-S6Tr9yDY4dS-Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:16:55 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.1-rc5
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 5:08 AM Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> This is not nice, would a patch like the following be acceptable?
Umm.
We actually already *have* this function.
It's called "gup_fast_permitted()" and it's used by x86-64 to verify
the proper address range. Exactly like s390 needs..
Could you please use that instead?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists