linux-kernel - [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Document that RT task priorities are 1...99

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-37a8f8590f307db8f8cfa62dfd82b3fc0978607c@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:13:11 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     bigeasy@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
        mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, john.ogness@...utronix.de,
        tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Document that RT task priorities are
 1...99

Commit-ID:  37a8f8590f307db8f8cfa62dfd82b3fc0978607c
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/37a8f8590f307db8f8cfa62dfd82b3fc0978607c
Author:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:08:21 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:06:08 +0200

sched/core: Document that RT task priorities are 1...99

John identified three files which claim that RT task priorities start at
zero. As far as I understand, 0 is used for DL and has nothing to do
wihich RT priorities as identified by the RT policy.

Correct the comment, valid RT priorities are in the range from 1 to 99.

Reported-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403210821.10916-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt | 2 +-
 include/linux/sched/prio.h                 | 2 +-
 kernel/sched/cpupri.h                      | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
index d8fce3e78457..23f8f8465a77 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ get their allocated time.
 
 Implementing SCHED_EDF might take a while to complete. Priority Inheritance is
 the biggest challenge as the current linux PI infrastructure is geared towards
-the limited static priority levels 0-99. With deadline scheduling you need to
+the limited static priority levels 1-99. With deadline scheduling you need to
 do deadline inheritance (since priority is inversely proportional to the
 deadline delta (deadline - now)).
 
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/prio.h b/include/linux/sched/prio.h
index 7d64feafc408..6986c3235684 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/prio.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/prio.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 /*
  * Priority of a process goes from 0..MAX_PRIO-1, valid RT
- * priority is 0..MAX_RT_PRIO-1, and SCHED_NORMAL/SCHED_BATCH
+ * priority is 1..MAX_RT_PRIO-1, and SCHED_NORMAL/SCHED_BATCH
  * tasks are in the range MAX_RT_PRIO..MAX_PRIO-1. Priority
  * values are inverted: lower p->prio value means higher priority.
  *
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.h b/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
index 7dc20a3232e7..40257a97fb8f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 #define CPUPRI_INVALID		-1
 #define CPUPRI_IDLE		 0
 #define CPUPRI_NORMAL		 1
-/* values 2-101 are RT priorities 0-99 */
+/* values 2-101 are RT priorities 1-99 */
 
 struct cpupri_vec {
 	atomic_t		count;