lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190416093634.GS11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:36:34 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     bigeasy@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, john.ogness@...utronix.de
Cc:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Document that RT task priorities
 are 1...99

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 01:13:11AM -0700, tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Commit-ID:  37a8f8590f307db8f8cfa62dfd82b3fc0978607c
> Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/37a8f8590f307db8f8cfa62dfd82b3fc0978607c
> Author:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:08:21 +0200
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:06:08 +0200
> 
> sched/core: Document that RT task priorities are 1...99
> 
> John identified three files which claim that RT task priorities start at
> zero. As far as I understand, 0 is used for DL and has nothing to do
> wihich RT priorities as identified by the RT policy.

DL is -1, 0 is still very much FIFO/FF

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ