[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190416093634.GS11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:36:34 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: bigeasy@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, john.ogness@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Document that RT task priorities
are 1...99
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 01:13:11AM -0700, tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Commit-ID: 37a8f8590f307db8f8cfa62dfd82b3fc0978607c
> Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/37a8f8590f307db8f8cfa62dfd82b3fc0978607c
> Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:08:21 +0200
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:06:08 +0200
>
> sched/core: Document that RT task priorities are 1...99
>
> John identified three files which claim that RT task priorities start at
> zero. As far as I understand, 0 is used for DL and has nothing to do
> wihich RT priorities as identified by the RT policy.
DL is -1, 0 is still very much FIFO/FF
Powered by blists - more mailing lists