linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND] drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: This fixes the following checkpatch warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:28:25 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND] drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: This fixes the
 following  checkpatch warning

On 15-04-19, 14:03, Mohan Kumar wrote:
> WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using function's name, in a
> string
> 
> Switch hardcoded function name with a reference to __func__ making the
> code more maintainable
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index c72258a..73bb2aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *dat
>  
>  	val = drv_read(data, mask);
>  
> -	pr_debug("get_cur_val = %u\n", val);
> +	pr_debug("%s = %u\n", __func__, val);
>  
>  	return val;
>  }
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>  	unsigned int freq;
>  	unsigned int cached_freq;
>  
> -	pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu);
> +	pr_debug("%s (%d)\n", __func__, cpu);
>  
>  	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
>  	if (unlikely(!policy))
> @@ -458,8 +458,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	if (acpi_pstate_strict) {
>  		if (!check_freqs(policy, mask,
>  				 policy->freq_table[index].frequency)) {
> -			pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_target failed (%d)\n",
> -				policy->cpu);
> +			pr_debug("%s (%d)\n", __func__, policy->cpu);
>  			result = -EAGAIN;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -573,7 +572,7 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_down_prep(unsigned int cpu)
>  static int __init acpi_cpufreq_early_init(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
> -	pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_early_init\n");
> +	pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
>  
>  	acpi_perf_data = alloc_percpu(struct acpi_processor_performance);
>  	if (!acpi_perf_data) {
> @@ -657,7 +656,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	static int blacklisted;
>  #endif
>  
> -	pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init\n");
> +	pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	if (blacklisted)
> @@ -856,7 +855,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>  
> -	pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
> +	pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
>  
>  	policy->fast_switch_possible = false;
>  	policy->driver_data = NULL;
> @@ -881,7 +880,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>  
> -	pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_resume\n");
> +	pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
>  
>  	data->resume = 1;
>  
> @@ -954,7 +953,7 @@ static int __init acpi_cpufreq_init(void)
>  	if (cpufreq_get_current_driver())
>  		return -EEXIST;
>  
> -	pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_init\n");
> +	pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
>  
>  	ret = acpi_cpufreq_early_init();
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -991,7 +990,7 @@ static int __init acpi_cpufreq_init(void)
>  
>  static void __exit acpi_cpufreq_exit(void)
>  {
> -	pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_exit\n");
> +	pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
>  
>  	acpi_cpufreq_boost_exit();
>  

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh