[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2b5b57e-ae55-8e7b-f4f4-fa4f15194d77@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:13:13 -0400
From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Joao Moreira <jmoreira@...e.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>, Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kbuild: Support for Symbols.list creation
On 4/11/19 3:04 PM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/samples/livepatch/Makefile b/samples/livepatch/Makefile
>> index 2472ce39a18d..8b9b42a258ad 100644
>> --- a/samples/livepatch/Makefile
>> +++ b/samples/livepatch/Makefile
>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>> +LIVEPATCH_livepatch-sample := y
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-sample.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-shadow-mod.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-shadow-fix1.o
>
> We discussed this and I think there has been no conclusion yet. Shouldn't
> we do the same (add LIVEPATCH_) for the other samples here as well?
In v2 review, I mentioned moving this hunk to ("modpost: Add modinfo
flag to livepatch modules") along with the same change to the other
sample modules. I didn't apply that for v3, but can do so for the next
spin if it makes the commits easier to review.
-- Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists