linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kbuild: Support for Symbols.list creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:02:56 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Joao Moreira <jmoreira@...e.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>, Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kbuild: Support for Symbols.list creation

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019, Joe Lawrence wrote:

> On 4/11/19 3:04 PM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > 
> >> diff --git a/samples/livepatch/Makefile b/samples/livepatch/Makefile
> >> index 2472ce39a18d..8b9b42a258ad 100644
> >> --- a/samples/livepatch/Makefile
> >> +++ b/samples/livepatch/Makefile
> >> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> >> +LIVEPATCH_livepatch-sample := y
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-sample.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-shadow-mod.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-shadow-fix1.o
> > 
> > We discussed this and I think there has been no conclusion yet. Shouldn't
> > we do the same (add LIVEPATCH_) for the other samples here as well?
> 
> In v2 review, I mentioned moving this hunk to ("modpost: Add modinfo flag to
> livepatch modules") along with the same change to the other sample modules.  I
> didn't apply that for v3, but can do so for the next spin if it makes the
> commits easier to review.

I think it belongs here, but I may be missing something. Anyway, it is not 
really important, so I'd leave it up to you.

Miroslav