[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VE1PR10MB288069C2FC4B6F79AE8F26A891250@VE1PR10MB2880.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:25:29 +0000
From: Eric Hyeung Dong Jeong <eric.jeong.opensource@...semi.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Eric Hyeung Dong Jeong <eric.jeong.opensource@...semi.com>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
DEVICETREE <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUX-KERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1 3/3] regulator: slg51000: add slg51000 regulator driver
On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:25 AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 01:37:27PM +0900, Eric Jeong wrote:
>
> > +static int slg51000_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> > +{
> > + struct slg51000 *chip = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> > + int ret, id = rdev_get_id(rdev);
> > + unsigned int state;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, es_reg[id].sreg, &state);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to read status register(%d)\n",
> > + ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!(state & SLG51000_STA_ILIM_FLAG_MASK) &&
> > + (state & SLG51000_STA_VOUT_OK_FLAG_MASK))
> > + return 1;
> > + else
> > + return 0;
>
> This looks like it should be a get_status() operation as it's reading
> status bits rather than the command we sent to the device - for that
> just use regulator_is_enabled_regmap().
I thought that it needs to return current status of a regulator when the function is called.
I am wondering that the *is_enabled()* function is just to check
If a regulator has been turned on or not rather than getting current status of the regulator.
Thanks
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists