[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190417142253.GH32622@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:22:54 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
jannh@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, serge@...lyn.com, luto@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, ebiederm@...ssion.com, keescook@...omium.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cyphar@...har.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, dancol@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] clone: add CLONE_PIDFD
On 04/16, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> + if (clone_flags & CLONE_PIDFD) {
> + retval = pidfd_create(pid, &pidfdf);
> + if (retval < 0)
> + goto bad_fork_free_pid;
> + pidfd = retval;
> + }
...
> + if (clone_flags & CLONE_PIDFD) {
> + fd_install(pidfd, pidfdf);
> + put_user(pidfd, parent_tidptr);
put_user() can fail, I don't think this error should be silently ignored,
this can lead to the hard-to-trigger/debug problems.
Why can't we do put_user-with-check along with pidfd_create() above?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists