[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190418084929.7ac2cb67@xps13>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:49:29 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: Drop board specific
partition info
Hi Janusz,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com> wrote on Thu, 18 Apr 2019
01:09:59 +0200:
> Hi Aaro, Tony,
>
> On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:40:10 AM CEST Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Janusz,
> >
> > Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com> wrote on Sun, 24 Mar 2019
> > 23:33:44 +0100:
> >
> > > After recent modifications, only a hardcoded partition info makes
> > > the driver device specific. Other than that, the driver uses GPIO
> > > exclusively and can be used on any hardware.
> > >
> > > Drop the partition info and use MTD partition parser with default list
> > > of parser names instead. For the OF parser to work correctly, pass
> > > device of_node to mtd.
> > >
> > > Amstrad Delta users should append the following partition info to their
> > > kernel command line, possibly by embedding it in CONFIG_CMDLINE:
> > >
> > > mtdparts=ams-delta-nand:3584k(Kernel),256k(u-boot),256k(u-boot_params),\
> > > 256k(Amstrad_LDR),27m(File_system),768k(PBL_reserved).
> > >
> > > For their convenience, CONFIG_MTD_CMDLINE_PARTS symbol is selected
> > > automatically from that board Kconfig if this NAND driver is also
> > > selected.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
> > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > FYI I am okay with the change but I am waiting for acks before applying
> > it.
>
> May we have an ack from you?
>
> If still not convinced with my clarifications, I can add a comment to help text
> in Kconfig, either squashed or in a follow up patch, on the requirement of
> appending mtdparts parameter to command line. What do you think?
In the same patch I guess that would be fine.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists