linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] vfs, coda: Fix the lack of locking in FID replacement inode rehashing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2286.1555603933@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:12:13 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>, coda@...cmu.edu,
        codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] vfs, coda: Fix the lack of locking in FID replacement inode rehashing

Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:

> Don't you also need to delete the remove_inode_hash() and
> __insert_inode_hash() calls?

Yep.  Good point.

David