linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Add support for XO 1.75 to OLPC battery driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190419124222.yizj6krkdi236x74@earth.universe>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:42:22 +0200
From:   Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Add support for XO 1.75 to OLPC battery driver

Hi Ingo,

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 09:57:16AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > > This patch set modifies the OLPC battery driver so that it could eventually
> > > be used on an Arm-based OLPC XO 1.75 machine.
> > > 
> > > Compared to the previous version, it addresses review comments for the
> > > x86 platform parts from Thomas Gleixner. Details in individual patches'
> > > change logs.
> > > 
> > > I've failed to version the previous iteration of the set that should've
> > > been "v6" for the change logs to make sense. Sorry for that.
> > > 
> > > Thank you,
> > > Lubo
> > 
> > I queued up the complete patchset via an immutable branch based on
> > v5.1-rc1. X86 maintainers can pull this signed immutable branch as
> > required. Thanks for the patches,
> 
> Would you mind sending these patches to Linus yourself, as part of the 
> power-supply tree?
> 
> That's where it really belongs, the impact on arch/x86/ was mostly 
> drive-by (and it's now all Acked-by Thomas), the meat of the changes is 
> in the OLPC battery driver.

Yes, I merged the immutable branch into power-supply. You can either
also merge it (e.g. when you plan to add other changes), or just ignore
it :) This is what I usually do with other subsystems to avoid
pointless merge conflicts.

TLDR: Yes.

-- Sebastian

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)