linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Add support for XO 1.75 to OLPC battery driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190419075716.GB6795@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:57:16 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Add support for XO 1.75 to OLPC battery driver


* Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > This patch set modifies the OLPC battery driver so that it could eventually
> > be used on an Arm-based OLPC XO 1.75 machine.
> > 
> > Compared to the previous version, it addresses review comments for the
> > x86 platform parts from Thomas Gleixner. Details in individual patches'
> > change logs.
> > 
> > I've failed to version the previous iteration of the set that should've
> > been "v6" for the change logs to make sense. Sorry for that.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Lubo
> 
> I queued up the complete patchset via an immutable branch based on
> v5.1-rc1. X86 maintainers can pull this signed immutable branch as
> required. Thanks for the patches,

Would you mind sending these patches to Linus yourself, as part of the 
power-supply tree?

That's where it really belongs, the impact on arch/x86/ was mostly 
drive-by (and it's now all Acked-by Thomas), the meat of the changes is 
in the OLPC battery driver.

Thanks,

	Ingo