linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] net/skbuff: don't waste memory reserves

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:36:58 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net/skbuff: don't waste memory reserves



On 04/19/2019 06:17 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/18/19 9:55 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:

>> Are you targeting net or net-next tree ?
>>
> 
> I think it's up to Dave to decide where the patches should go. They apply cleanly on both trees.
> The last two patches just minor cleanups so they are definitely net-next material.
> 

Not at all, please carefully read 

Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst

Q: How do I indicate which tree (net vs. net-next) my patch should be in?

You need to split your patches in two series, not assume that David will manually do
the manual work for you.

Thank you