linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: allow tests to use bad virtual-APIC page address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:33:40 -0700
From:   Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: allow tests to use bad virtual-APIC page
 address



On 04/15/2019 06:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> As mentioned in the comment, there are some special cases where we can simply
> clear the TPR shadow bit from the CPU-based execution controls in the vmcs02.
> Handle them so that we can remove some XFAILs from vmx.flat.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c    |  2 +-
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h    |  2 ++
>   3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 7ec9bb1dd723..a22af5a85540 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2873,20 +2873,27 @@ static void nested_get_vmcs12_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		/*
>   		 * If translation failed, VM entry will fail because
>   		 * prepare_vmcs02 set VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR to -1ull.
> -		 * Failing the vm entry is _not_ what the processor
> -		 * does but it's basically the only possibility we
> -		 * have.  We could still enter the guest if CR8 load
> -		 * exits are enabled, CR8 store exits are enabled, and
> -		 * virtualize APIC access is disabled; in this case
> -		 * the processor would never use the TPR shadow and we
> -		 * could simply clear the bit from the execution
> -		 * control.  But such a configuration is useless, so
> -		 * let's keep the code simple.
>   		 */
>   		if (!is_error_page(page)) {
>   			vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page = page;
>   			hpa = page_to_phys(vmx->nested.virtual_apic_page);
>   			vmcs_write64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR, hpa);
> +		} else if (nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_CR8_LOAD_EXITING) &&
> +		           nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_CR8_STORE_EXITING) &&
> +			   !nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The processor will never use the TPR shadow, simply
> +			 * clear the bit from the execution control.  Such a
> +			 * configuration is useless, but it happens in tests.
> +			 * For any other configuration, failing the vm entry is
> +			 * _not_ what the processor does but it's basically the
> +			 * only possibility we have.
> +			 */
> +			vmcs_clear_bits(CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL,
> +					CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW);
> +		} else {
> +			printk("bad virtual-APIC page address\n");
> +			dump_vmcs();
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index f8054dc1de65..14cacfd7ffd0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -5603,7 +5603,7 @@ static void vmx_dump_dtsel(char *name, uint32_t limit)
>   	       vmcs_readl(limit + GUEST_GDTR_BASE - GUEST_GDTR_LIMIT));
>   }
>   
> -static void dump_vmcs(void)
> +void dump_vmcs(void)
>   {
>   	u32 vmentry_ctl = vmcs_read32(VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS);
>   	u32 vmexit_ctl = vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_CONTROLS);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index a1e00d0a2482..f879529906b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -517,4 +517,6 @@ static inline void decache_tsc_multiplier(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>   	vmcs_write64(TSC_MULTIPLIER, vmx->current_tsc_ratio);
>   }
>   
> +void dump_vmcs(void);
> +
>   #endif /* __KVM_X86_VMX_H */

Reviewed-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>