linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: input: fix assignment of .value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:54:07 -0600
From:   James Feeney <james@...ealm.net>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: input: fix assignment of .value

On 4/23/19 11:21 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [This is an automated email]
> 
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: 2dc702c991e3 HID: input: use the Resolution Multiplier for high-resolution scrolling.
> 
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.0.9.
> 
> v5.0.9: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     724f54bc0063 ("HID: input: make sure the wheel high resolution multiplier is set")
> 
> 
> How should we proceed with this patch?
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha
> 

This patch will only apply *after* the application of the first patch, since they "overlap".

Yes, that is probably not the best circumstance.  I think Benjamin wanted to keep the issue in patch 2/2 distinct.

Was the first patch applied before attempting application of the second patch?

James