[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190423193650.GQ17719@sasha-vm>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:36:50 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: James Feeney <james@...ealm.net>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: input: fix assignment of .value
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:54:07AM -0600, James Feeney wrote:
>On 4/23/19 11:21 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [This is an automated email]
>>
>> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
>> fixing commit: 2dc702c991e3 HID: input: use the Resolution Multiplier for high-resolution scrolling.
>>
>> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.0.9.
>>
>> v5.0.9: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>> 724f54bc0063 ("HID: input: make sure the wheel high resolution multiplier is set")
>>
>>
>> How should we proceed with this patch?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Sasha
>>
>
>This patch will only apply *after* the application of the first patch, since they "overlap".
>
>Yes, that is probably not the best circumstance. I think Benjamin wanted to keep the issue in patch 2/2 distinct.
>
>Was the first patch applied before attempting application of the second patch?
My script messed up and listed it as a dependency (even though it's not
upstream) rather than applying it. I'll look into it, sorry for the
noise.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists