[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190423123611.1f7276cc4eb9f7a7005899a9@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:36:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] powerpc: select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
for PPC64
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:37:33 +0200 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr> wrote:
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ config PPC
> > select BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT
> > select CLONE_BACKWARDS
> > select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS if PPC64 && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> > + select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS if PPC64
>
> Why only PPC64 ? Won't it work with PPC32 ? Or would it be
> counter-performant on 32 bits ?
Ditto arm and i386?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists