[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7333cd3b85b47d5f28d7652031b2b1b1@agner.ch>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:37:11 +0200
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jeremyfertic@...il.com
Subject: Re: Kconfig dependency issue on function-graph tracer and frame
pointer on arm
On 15.04.2019 14:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 3:35 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> The subsequent hunks remove the defaulting of the choice according to
>> the function graph tracer - this is not a "hint" where the user can
>> still choose either option irrespective of the state of the function
>> graph tracer. They should only be able to select the frame pointer
>> option in that case.
>>
>> Another way forward would be for someone to put the work in to making
>> the function graph tracer work without frame pointers.
>
> I think Stefan was already looking into making CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> work with clang. I don't know what the status of that work is, but I
> think getting
> FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER working at the same time would be best.
Function Tracer is currently blocked by buggy mcount implemention on
Clang side. I do have a hacked up version which works with the buggy
Clang implementation, but not something we want to merge IMHO. see also:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33845
>
> I never noticed the Kconfig issue here, because I was using a patch to
> turn off FUNCTION_TRACER on ARM with clang to make it build, and that
> turns off FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER in the process.
>
>> So, how about this:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index 850b4805e2d1..9aed25a6019b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ config ARM
>> select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS if (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7) && MMU
>> select HAVE_EXIT_THREAD
>> select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD if !XIP_KERNEL
>> - select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER if !THUMB2_KERNEL
>> + select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER if !THUMB2_KERNEL && !CC_IS_CLANG
>> select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if !XIP_KERNEL
I think due to the fact above, we should add && !CC_IS_CLANG here too.
>> select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS
>> select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT if PERF_EVENTS && (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> index 6d6e0330930b..e388af4594a6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ config DEBUG_WX
>>
>> choice
>> prompt "Choose kernel unwinder"
>> - default UNWINDER_ARM if AEABI && !FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
>> - default UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER if !AEABI || FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
>> + default UNWINDER_ARM if AEABI
>> + default UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER if !AEABI
>> help
>> This determines which method will be used for unwinding kernel stack
>> traces for panics, oopses, bugs, warnings, perf, /proc/<pid>/stack,
>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ config UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER
>>
>> config UNWINDER_ARM
>> bool "ARM EABI stack unwinder"
>> - depends on AEABI
>> + depends on AEABI && !FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
>> select ARM_UNWIND
>> help
>> This option enables stack unwinding support in the kernel
>
> This looks good to me in the meantime, at least if there is any
> way to get the non-graph FUNCTION_TRACER to build with clang.
Looks sensible to me too.
Note that a similar issue came up a while ago on the mailing list:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=154739414703313&w=2
[added Jeremy]
Unfortunately this never really materialized in a mergeable patch.
--
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists