[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190423203754.mdtjssru2h2rzqou@treble>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:37:54 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
peterz@...radead.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
julien.thierry@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/6] arm64: sleep: Add stack frame setup for
__cpu_supsend_enter
In $SUBJECT, s/supsend/suspend/.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:52:42PM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote:
> Annotate cpu_resume and _cpu_resume to silence objtool warning
> about non-standard stack frame.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> index 3e53ffa07994..eb434525fe82 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ ENTRY(__cpu_suspend_enter)
> str x0, [x1]
> add x0, x0, #SLEEP_STACK_DATA_SYSTEM_REGS
> stp x29, lr, [sp, #-16]!
> + mov x29, sp
Why is it changing the actual code? The patch description indicates
that it's only adding annotations.
> bl cpu_do_suspend
> ldp x29, lr, [sp], #16
> mov x0, #1
> @@ -146,3 +147,6 @@ ENTRY(_cpu_resume)
> mov x0, #0
> ret
> ENDPROC(_cpu_resume)
> +
> + asm_stack_frame_non_standard cpu_resume
> + asm_stack_frame_non_standard _cpu_resume
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists