[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190423071354.GB12114@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:13:54 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DISCONTIGMEM is deprecated
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:16:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 32-bit NUMA systems should be non-existent in practice. The last NUMA
> system I'm aware of that was both NUMA and 32-bit only died somewhere
> between 2004 and 2007. If someone is running a 64-bit capable system in
> 32-bit mode with NUMA, they really are just punishing themselves for fun.
Can we mark it as BROKEN to see if someone shouts and then remove it
a year or two down the road? Or just kill it off now..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists