linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx TOC tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jPyaGQcDfpW5b7A-_3bvkfL78MxFmPtjwCGZ4-=KwUwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:39:47 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx TOC tree

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:30 PM Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Corbet and All,
> The kernel now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful documentation
> from reStructuredText files. I converted all of the Linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs to
> reST format in this serias.
>
> In this version I combined ACPI and PCI docs, and added new x86 docs conversion.

I'm not sure if combining all three into one big patch series has been
a good idea, honestly.

It would have been easier to review and handle otherwise.

For one, I'd like to handle the ACPI part of it myself if Jon doesn't mind that.

Thanks,
Rafael