linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx TOC tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190423173644.GA14616@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:36:44 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx TOC
 tree

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 06:39:47PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:30 PM Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi Corbet and All,
> > The kernel now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful
> > documentation from reStructuredText files. I converted all of the Linux
> > ACPI/PCI/X86 docs to reST format in this serias.
> >
> > In this version I combined ACPI and PCI docs, and added new x86 docs
> > conversion.
> 
> I'm not sure if combining all three into one big patch series has been
> a good idea, honestly.

Yeah, if you post this again, I would find it easier to deal with if
linux-pci only got the PCI-related things.  63 patches is a little too
much for one series.

Bjorn