[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424063240.vr5in5nez6hl2zgr@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:32:40 +0200
From: "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"plyatov@...il.com" <plyatov@...il.com>,
"sean.nyekjaer@...vas.dk" <sean.nyekjaer@...vas.dk>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/15] spi: imx: remove ERR009165 workaround on i.mx6ul
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 01:51:10PM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:
> ERR009165 fix on i.mx6ul and next chip, such as i.mx6ull/i.mx8mq/i.mx8mm.
> Remove workaround on those chips. Add new i.mx6ul type for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> index eb56eac..2e5e978 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ enum spi_imx_devtype {
> IMX35_CSPI, /* CSPI on all i.mx except above */
> IMX51_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx51 */
> IMX53_ECSPI, /* ECSPI on i.mx53 and later */
> + IMX6UL_ECSPI, /* ERR009165 fix from i.mx6ul */
> };
>
> struct spi_imx_data;
> @@ -128,7 +129,8 @@ static inline int is_imx35_cspi(struct spi_imx_data *d)
>
> static inline int is_imx51_ecspi(struct spi_imx_data *d)
> {
> - return d->devtype_data->devtype == IMX51_ECSPI;
> + return d->devtype_data->devtype == IMX51_ECSPI ||
> + d->devtype_data->devtype == IMX6UL_ECSPI;
> }
>
> static inline int is_imx53_ecspi(struct spi_imx_data *d)
> @@ -585,9 +587,16 @@ static int mx51_ecspi_prepare_transfer(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> ctrl |= mx51_ecspi_clkdiv(spi_imx, t->speed_hz, &clk);
> spi_imx->spi_bus_clk = clk;
>
> - /* ERR009165: work in XHC mode as PIO */
> - if (spi_imx->usedma)
> - ctrl &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_SMC;
> + /*
> + * ERR009165: work in XHC mode instead of SMC as PIO on the chips
> + * before i.mx6ul.
> + */
> + if (spi_imx->usedma) {
> + if (spi_imx->devtype_data->devtype == IMX6UL_ECSPI)
> + ctrl |= MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_SMC;
> + else
> + ctrl &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_SMC;
> + }
>
> writel(ctrl, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL);
>
> @@ -615,6 +624,8 @@ static void mx51_setup_wml(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx)
> {
> u32 tx_wml = 0;
>
> + if (spi_imx->devtype_data->devtype == IMX6UL_ECSPI)
> + tx_wml = spi_imx->wml;
This if clause has to be adjusted for every new SoC which doesn't have
this issue. Better introduce a has_err009165 boolean flag to the driver
data and set it where necessary.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists