linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1 01/15] Revert "ARM: dts: imx6q: Use correct SDMA script for SPI5 core"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 02:59:45 +0000
From:   Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
To:     "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>
CC:     dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "plyatov@...il.com" <plyatov@...il.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sean.nyekjaer@...vas.dk" <sean.nyekjaer@...vas.dk>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1 01/15] Revert "ARM: dts: imx6q: Use correct
 SDMA script for SPI5 core"

On 2019-04-23 at 11:02 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Robin,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:50 AM Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > This reverts commit df07101e1c4a29e820df02f9989a066988b160e6.
> You need to provide a detailed explanation in the commit log as to
> why
> the revert is needed.
Okay, will address your comments into V2.