linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] livepatch: Convert error about unsupported reliable stacktrace into a warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:48:32 +0530
From:   Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] livepatch: Convert error about unsupported reliable
 stacktrace into a warning

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:55:48AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> The commit d0807da78e11d46f ("livepatch: Remove immediate feature") caused
> that any livepatch was refused when reliable stacktraces were not supported
> on the given architecture.
> 
> The limitation is too strong. User space processes are safely migrated
> even when entering or leaving the kernel. Kthreads transition would
> need to get forced. But it is safe when:
> 
>    + The livepatch does not change the semantic of the code.
>    + Callbacks do not depend on a safely finished transition.
> 
> Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>

Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

-- 
Kamalesh