linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Allow userland to request that the kernel clear memory on release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:40:48 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Allow userland to request that the kernel clear
 memory on release

On 4/25/19 2:14 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Please cc linux-api for user visible API proposals (now done). Keep the
> rest of the email intact for reference.
> 
> On Wed 24-04-19 14:10:39, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
>>
>> Applications that hold secrets and wish to avoid them leaking can use
>> mlock() to prevent the page from being pushed out to swap and
>> MADV_DONTDUMP to prevent it from being included in core dumps. Applications

So, do we really need a new madvise() flag and VMA flag, or can we just
infer this page clearing from mlock+MADV_DONTDUMP being both applied?