[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCA9yPKzr=UPtGDe+fCxd3H6cjpoPKQwfZNvPq4QKC0EBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:25:04 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rockchip tree with the amlogic tree
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:31 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rockchip tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 029da5e5266c ("ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: enable the Amlogic Meson ADC and eFuse drivers")
>
> from the amlogic tree and commit:
>
> 366391f04177 ("ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable missing drivers for supported Chromebooks")
>
> from the rockchip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
I just checked the result in next-20190426 and it looks fine
thank you for taking care of this!
do you need anything from me (Acked-by, etc.) to avoid any issues
during the merge for Linus and/or the ARM maintainers?
Regards
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists