[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190426.112911.295562414103597921.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:29:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gustavo@...eddedor.com
Cc: arnd@...db.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: socket: Fix missing break in switch
statement
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:31:24 -0500
> Add missing break statement in order to prevent the code from falling
> through to cases SIOCGSTAMP_NEW and SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW.
>
> This bug was found thanks to the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Fixes: 0768e17073dc ("net: socket: implement 64-bit timestamps")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists