[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <437c77d4-99a8-5350-3bd8-c9a44d5c18b6@embeddedor.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:45:54 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: socket: Fix missing break in switch
statement
On 4/26/19 10:29 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:31:24 -0500
>
>> Add missing break statement in order to prevent the code from falling
>> through to cases SIOCGSTAMP_NEW and SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW.
>>
>> This bug was found thanks to the ongoing efforts to enable
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Fixes: 0768e17073dc ("net: socket: implement 64-bit timestamps")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>
> Applied.
>
Great. :)
Thanks, Dave.
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists