linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 03/79] ASoC: ab8500: Mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190427180029.GK14916@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 28 Apr 2019 03:00:29 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 03/79] ASoC: ab8500: Mark expected switch
 fall-through

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:31:22PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On 4/27/19 12:14 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Are we *realy* going to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough in stable kernels
> > and both backport all the fixes and add new fixes for the issues which
> > don't have backportable fixes?

> I don't think so.

> There are hundreds of these patches in mainline, and I think this is
> the first time I see one of them being backported.

Right, this looked like a super weird thing to backport.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)