linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 03/79] ASoC: ab8500: Mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190428010618.GG17719@sasha-vm>
Date:   Sat, 27 Apr 2019 21:06:19 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 03/79] ASoC: ab8500: Mark expected switch
 fall-through

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 03:00:29AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:31:22PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> On 4/27/19 12:14 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > Are we *realy* going to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough in stable kernels
>> > and both backport all the fixes and add new fixes for the issues which
>> > don't have backportable fixes?
>
>> I don't think so.
>
>> There are hundreds of these patches in mainline, and I think this is
>> the first time I see one of them being backported.
>
>Right, this looked like a super weird thing to backport.

I agree, it's part of my scripts to drop them but somehow this one snuck
through. I'll drop it. Thanks for pointing it out!

--
Thanks,
Sasha