[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190428054711.GD14896@rapoport-lnx>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 08:47:11 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Jonathan Adams <jwadams@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/mm/fault: hook up SCI verification
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:42:23AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:45:52AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > If a system call runs in isolated context, it's accesses to kernel code and
> > data will be verified by SCI susbsytem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> There's a distinct lack of touching do_double_fault(). It appears to me
> that you'll instantly trigger #DF when you #PF, because the #PF handler
> itself will not be able to run.
The #PF handler is able to run. On interrupt/error entry the cr3 is
switched to the full kernel page tables, pretty much like PTI does for
user <-> kernel transitions. It's in the patch 3.
> And then obviously you have to be very careful to make sure #DF can,
> _at_all_times_ run, otherwise you'll tripple-fault and we all know what
> that does.
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists