lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40b48947-b80e-7971-376d-52b594e26d17@c-s.fr>
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:35:53 +0200
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 09/11] powerpc/mm/radix: mark
 __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize() as __always_inline



Le 23/04/2019 à 05:49, Masahiro Yamada a écrit :
> This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common
> place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand.

How did you identify the functions requiring __always_inline as this one 
? Just by 'test and see if it fails', or did you have some script or so ?

Here the problem is that one of the parameters of the function are used 
as "immediate" constraint for the inline assembly, therefore requiring 
the function to always be inline.

I guess this should be explained in the commit log and I'm wondering how 
you ensure that you did identify all functions like this.

Christophe

> 
> If it is enabled for powerpc, the following error is reported:
> 
> arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__radix__flush_tlb_range_psize':
> arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: error: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror]
>    asm volatile(PPC_TLBIEL(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1)
>    ^~~
> arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
>    - split into a separate patch
> 
>   arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c
> index 6a23b9ebd2a1..a2b2848f0ae3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c
> @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ void radix__tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>   	tlb->need_flush_all = 0;
>   }
>   
> -static inline void __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm,
> +static __always_inline void __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   				unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>   				int psize, bool also_pwc)
>   {
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ